Experts Urge Parents To Buy Kids Sunglasses Against Ultraviolet Radiation.
With May designated as UV awareness month, experts are trade on parents to retaliate unique mind to the protection of their children's eyes this summer. Although judgement preservation is a concern for people of all ages, Prevent Blindness America, the nation's oldest perspicacity trim and safety organization, warns that children are singularly vulnerable to the harmful ultraviolet A and B (UVA and UVB) mutilation that can accompany Ra exposure this site. For one, children as a rule spend more time in the sun, the group noted.
In addition, the assembling highlights the American Optometric Association's cautionary verdict that the lenses of sophomoric eyes are more transparent than that of adults, risking retinal disclosing to a greater degree of short wavelength light. "We sine qua non to remember to keep our eyes from UV every day of the year," Hugh R Parry, president and CEO of Prevent Blindness America, said in a despatch release. "UV rays reflecting off the water, sand, pavement and even snow are unusually dangerous. We can foster our children to tediously the right eyeball protection by leading by example".
UV exposure has been linked to the commencement of cataracts, macular degeneration and a fully array of eye health issues, the experts noted. Prevent Blindness America advises that everybody under the sun who goes out in the Phoebus should wear sunglasses that obstacle out 99 percent to 100 percent of both UVA and UVB emanation - noting that sunglasses without such security can actually cause the pupils to dilate, thereby doing more mischief than good. A wide-brimmed hat or top also offers some measure of eye protection, the faction suggested.
With specific respect to children, Prevent Blindness America further encourages parents to protect that sunglasses disposed their child's appearance properly and shields the sun's rays from all directions. The troupe points out that wrap-around sunglasses might be optimal in the later regard, because they additionally nurture the pelt immediately surrounding a child's eyes. Sunglasses, they note, should always be composed of impact-resistant polycarbonates, rather than glass, and should be scratch-free.
Showing posts with label radiation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label radiation. Show all posts
Sunday, 21 April 2019
Tuesday, 26 December 2017
Radiation Treatment Of Prostate Cancer
Radiation Treatment Of Prostate Cancer.
Smoking doubles the chances that a prostate cancer self-possessed will espy his affliction broaden and that he will eventually die from his illness, a new swat finds. "Basically we found that people who smoke had a higher gamble of their tumor coming back, of it spreading and, ultimately, even slipping away of prostate cancer," said swot co-author Dr Michael Zelefsky. He is flaw chair of clinical enquire in the department of radiation oncology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City enlargement. "But interestingly, this applied only to 'current smokers' who were smoking around the span they received outside bar therapy," Zelefsky added, referring to the textbook formula of radiation curing for prostate cancer.
So "Former smokers did not have the increased chance for disease spread and recurrence that course smokers did. "However, we also looked at how smoking studied treatment side effects," from the diffusion treatment, which can include rectal bleeding and/or patronize and urgent urination. "And we platitude that both patients who smoked and former smokers seemed to have a higher danger of urinary-related side stuff after therapy".
Zelefsky and his colleagues reported the findings online Jan 27, 2015 in the list BJU International. The check in team telling out that 19 percent of American adults smoke. To inquire the impact of smoking the on prostate cancer treatment and progression, the scrutiny authors focused on nearly 2400 patients who underwent remedying for prostate cancer between 1988 and 2005. Nearly 50 percent were identified as "former smokers," even if they had only kicked their tendency curtly before beginning cancer treatment.
Disease progression, relapse, symptoms and deaths were all tracked for an norm of eight years, as were all reactions to the dispersal treatment. The researchers firm that the strong of surviving prostate cancer for a decade without experiencing any malady recurrence was about 66 percent mid patients who had never smoked. By comparison, that illustration fell to 52 percent middle patients who were current smokers.
Smoking doubles the chances that a prostate cancer self-possessed will espy his affliction broaden and that he will eventually die from his illness, a new swat finds. "Basically we found that people who smoke had a higher gamble of their tumor coming back, of it spreading and, ultimately, even slipping away of prostate cancer," said swot co-author Dr Michael Zelefsky. He is flaw chair of clinical enquire in the department of radiation oncology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City enlargement. "But interestingly, this applied only to 'current smokers' who were smoking around the span they received outside bar therapy," Zelefsky added, referring to the textbook formula of radiation curing for prostate cancer.
So "Former smokers did not have the increased chance for disease spread and recurrence that course smokers did. "However, we also looked at how smoking studied treatment side effects," from the diffusion treatment, which can include rectal bleeding and/or patronize and urgent urination. "And we platitude that both patients who smoked and former smokers seemed to have a higher danger of urinary-related side stuff after therapy".
Zelefsky and his colleagues reported the findings online Jan 27, 2015 in the list BJU International. The check in team telling out that 19 percent of American adults smoke. To inquire the impact of smoking the on prostate cancer treatment and progression, the scrutiny authors focused on nearly 2400 patients who underwent remedying for prostate cancer between 1988 and 2005. Nearly 50 percent were identified as "former smokers," even if they had only kicked their tendency curtly before beginning cancer treatment.
Disease progression, relapse, symptoms and deaths were all tracked for an norm of eight years, as were all reactions to the dispersal treatment. The researchers firm that the strong of surviving prostate cancer for a decade without experiencing any malady recurrence was about 66 percent mid patients who had never smoked. By comparison, that illustration fell to 52 percent middle patients who were current smokers.
Tuesday, 25 July 2017
Surgery to treat rectal cancer
Surgery to treat rectal cancer.
For many rectal cancer patients, the expectation of surgery is a worrisome reality, given that the manipulation can significantly weaken both bowel and procreant function. However, a unfledged study reveals that some cancer patients may passenger just as well by forgoing surgery in favor of chemotherapy/radiation and "watchful waiting". The conclusion is based on a periodical of data from 145 rectal cancer patients, all of whom had been diagnosed with dais I, II or III disease view. All had chemotherapy and radiation.
But about half had surgery while the others staved off the modus operandi in favor of rigorous tracking of their condition spread - on occasion called "watchful waiting. We put faith that our results will encourage more doctors to have regard for this 'watch-and-wait' approach in patients with clinical utter response as an alternative to immediate rectal surgery, at least for some patients," superior contemplate author Dr Philip Paty said in a advice release from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).
For many rectal cancer patients, the expectation of surgery is a worrisome reality, given that the manipulation can significantly weaken both bowel and procreant function. However, a unfledged study reveals that some cancer patients may passenger just as well by forgoing surgery in favor of chemotherapy/radiation and "watchful waiting". The conclusion is based on a periodical of data from 145 rectal cancer patients, all of whom had been diagnosed with dais I, II or III disease view. All had chemotherapy and radiation.
But about half had surgery while the others staved off the modus operandi in favor of rigorous tracking of their condition spread - on occasion called "watchful waiting. We put faith that our results will encourage more doctors to have regard for this 'watch-and-wait' approach in patients with clinical utter response as an alternative to immediate rectal surgery, at least for some patients," superior contemplate author Dr Philip Paty said in a advice release from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).
Tuesday, 27 December 2011
Mammography Is Against The Lifetime Risk Of Breast Cancer
Mammography Is Against The Lifetime Risk Of Breast Cancer.
The unrealized cancer jeopardize that shedding from mammograms might cause is precarious compared to the benefits of lives saved from anciently detection, new Canadian fact-finding says. The study is published online and will appear in the January 2011 linocut culmination of Radiology. This risk of radiation-induced soul cancers "is mentioned periodically by women and kin who are critiquing screening and how often it should be done and in whom," said enquiry author Dr Martin J Yaffe, a major scientist in imaging study at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and a professor in the departments of medical biophysics and medical imaging at the University of Toronto drug Cymbalta generic. "This sanctum says that the superior obtained from having a screening mammogram far exceeds the chance you might have from the emission received from the low-dose mammogram," said Dr Arnold J Rotter, boss of the computed tomography sector and a clinical professor of radiology at the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, in Duarte, Calif.
Yaffe and his colleague, Dr James G Mainprize, developed a arithmetical ne plus ultra to estimation the imperil of radiation-induced teat cancer following exposure to diffusion from mammograms, and then estimated the number of breast cancers, cataclysmic breast cancers and years of person lost attributable to the mammography's screening radiation. They plugged into the pattern a typical emanation dose for digital mammography, 3,7 milligrays (mGy), and applied it to 100000 putative women, screened annually between the ages of 40 and 55 and then every other year between the ages of 56 and 74.
They deliberate what the endanger would be from the dispersal over time and took into narration other causes of death. "We used an unalloyed risk model," Yaffe said. That is, it computes "if a infallible count of people get a certain amount of radiation, down the autoroute a certain number of cancers will be caused".
The unrealized cancer jeopardize that shedding from mammograms might cause is precarious compared to the benefits of lives saved from anciently detection, new Canadian fact-finding says. The study is published online and will appear in the January 2011 linocut culmination of Radiology. This risk of radiation-induced soul cancers "is mentioned periodically by women and kin who are critiquing screening and how often it should be done and in whom," said enquiry author Dr Martin J Yaffe, a major scientist in imaging study at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and a professor in the departments of medical biophysics and medical imaging at the University of Toronto drug Cymbalta generic. "This sanctum says that the superior obtained from having a screening mammogram far exceeds the chance you might have from the emission received from the low-dose mammogram," said Dr Arnold J Rotter, boss of the computed tomography sector and a clinical professor of radiology at the City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, in Duarte, Calif.
Yaffe and his colleague, Dr James G Mainprize, developed a arithmetical ne plus ultra to estimation the imperil of radiation-induced teat cancer following exposure to diffusion from mammograms, and then estimated the number of breast cancers, cataclysmic breast cancers and years of person lost attributable to the mammography's screening radiation. They plugged into the pattern a typical emanation dose for digital mammography, 3,7 milligrays (mGy), and applied it to 100000 putative women, screened annually between the ages of 40 and 55 and then every other year between the ages of 56 and 74.
They deliberate what the endanger would be from the dispersal over time and took into narration other causes of death. "We used an unalloyed risk model," Yaffe said. That is, it computes "if a infallible count of people get a certain amount of radiation, down the autoroute a certain number of cancers will be caused".
Friday, 21 October 2011
Solar Ultraviolet Radiation Danger At Ski Resorts
Solar Ultraviolet Radiation Danger At Ski Resorts.
Skiers and other outside enthusiasts requisite to be knowing that factors such as live through conditions and time of day can cause considerable differing in the levels of ultraviolet (UV) radiation during the winter, researchers say. They analyzed observations composed between 2001 and 2003 at 32 high-altitude ski resorts in western North America rogaine for men hair regrowth treatment, �����. They also interviewed grown-up guests at the resorts and looked at their clothing and materiel in procedure to assess their plane of sun protection.
Average UV levels at the ski resorts were to some degree low but diverse substantially, the researchers found. Clear skies, heyday close to noon, and more hours of sunshine as the ski season progressed were the strongest predictors of increased UV radiation. The researchers also found youth associations between higher UV shedding and altitude, longitude and temperature.
However, dignified UV levels were not associated with increased use of sun-protection measures, such as sunscreen lip balm, commitment of sunscreen 30 minutes before skiing, wearing a forefront wrap with a brim, or wearing gloves. The swotting did perceive that as UV levels increased, adults were more proper to wear sunscreen with a reduced 15 SPF and to reapply it after two hours, and more appropriate to wear sunglasses or goggles. Men were more seemly than women to use sunscreen.
Skiers and other outside enthusiasts requisite to be knowing that factors such as live through conditions and time of day can cause considerable differing in the levels of ultraviolet (UV) radiation during the winter, researchers say. They analyzed observations composed between 2001 and 2003 at 32 high-altitude ski resorts in western North America rogaine for men hair regrowth treatment, �����. They also interviewed grown-up guests at the resorts and looked at their clothing and materiel in procedure to assess their plane of sun protection.
Average UV levels at the ski resorts were to some degree low but diverse substantially, the researchers found. Clear skies, heyday close to noon, and more hours of sunshine as the ski season progressed were the strongest predictors of increased UV radiation. The researchers also found youth associations between higher UV shedding and altitude, longitude and temperature.
However, dignified UV levels were not associated with increased use of sun-protection measures, such as sunscreen lip balm, commitment of sunscreen 30 minutes before skiing, wearing a forefront wrap with a brim, or wearing gloves. The swotting did perceive that as UV levels increased, adults were more proper to wear sunscreen with a reduced 15 SPF and to reapply it after two hours, and more appropriate to wear sunglasses or goggles. Men were more seemly than women to use sunscreen.
Tuesday, 11 October 2011
Cancer Risk From CT Scans Lower Than Previously Thought
Cancer Risk From CT Scans Lower Than Previously Thought.
The jeopardy of developing cancer as a conclusion of diffusion danger from CT scans may be put down than previously thought, new research suggests. That finding, scheduled to be presented Wednesday at the annual converging of the Radiological Society of North America in Chicago, is based on an eight-year interpretation of Medicare records covering nearly 11 million patients. "What we found is that overall between two and four out of every 10000 patients who bear a CT c con are at peril for developing unoriginal cancers as a follow-up of that dispersal exposure," said Aabed Meer, an MD runner in the department of radiology at Stanford University in Palo Alto, Calif sitemap. "And that risk, I would say, is deign than we expected it to be," said Meer.
As a result, patients who lack a CT study should not be frightened of the consequences, Meer stated. "If you have a hint and need a CT delve into of the head, the benefits of that scan at that consideration outweigh the very minor possibility of developing a cancer as a consequence of the scan itself," he explained. "CT scans do remarkable things in terms of diagnosis. Yes, there is some shedding risk. But that minuscule risk should always be put in context".
The authors set out to quantify that chance by sifting through the medical records of elderly patients covered by Medicare between 1998 and 2005. The researchers separated the figures into two periods: 1998 to 2001 and 2002 to 2005. In the earlier period, 42 percent of the patients had undergone CT scans. For the span 2002 to 2005, that celebrity rose to 49 percent, which was not surprising given the increasing use of scans in US medical care.
Within each group, the into or set reviewed the hundred and class of CT scans administered to undergo how many patients received low-dose emission (50 to 100 millisieverts) and how many got high-dose emanation (more than 100 millisieverts). They then estimated how many cancers were induced using type cancer jeopardize models.
The jeopardy of developing cancer as a conclusion of diffusion danger from CT scans may be put down than previously thought, new research suggests. That finding, scheduled to be presented Wednesday at the annual converging of the Radiological Society of North America in Chicago, is based on an eight-year interpretation of Medicare records covering nearly 11 million patients. "What we found is that overall between two and four out of every 10000 patients who bear a CT c con are at peril for developing unoriginal cancers as a follow-up of that dispersal exposure," said Aabed Meer, an MD runner in the department of radiology at Stanford University in Palo Alto, Calif sitemap. "And that risk, I would say, is deign than we expected it to be," said Meer.
As a result, patients who lack a CT study should not be frightened of the consequences, Meer stated. "If you have a hint and need a CT delve into of the head, the benefits of that scan at that consideration outweigh the very minor possibility of developing a cancer as a consequence of the scan itself," he explained. "CT scans do remarkable things in terms of diagnosis. Yes, there is some shedding risk. But that minuscule risk should always be put in context".
The authors set out to quantify that chance by sifting through the medical records of elderly patients covered by Medicare between 1998 and 2005. The researchers separated the figures into two periods: 1998 to 2001 and 2002 to 2005. In the earlier period, 42 percent of the patients had undergone CT scans. For the span 2002 to 2005, that celebrity rose to 49 percent, which was not surprising given the increasing use of scans in US medical care.
Within each group, the into or set reviewed the hundred and class of CT scans administered to undergo how many patients received low-dose emission (50 to 100 millisieverts) and how many got high-dose emanation (more than 100 millisieverts). They then estimated how many cancers were induced using type cancer jeopardize models.
Friday, 1 July 2011
Weather Conditions May Affect Prostate Cancer Patients
Weather Conditions May Affect Prostate Cancer Patients.
A budding enquiry links dry, discouraging climate to higher rates of prostate cancer. While the findings don't corroborate a direct link, researchers mistrust that weather may affect polluting and, in turn, boost prostate cancer rates ilosone from india. "We found that colder weather, and critical rainfall, were strongly correlated with prostate cancer," researcher Sophie St-Hilaire, of Idaho State University, said in a news broadcast release.
So "Although we can't hold certainly why this correlation exists, the trends are uniform with what we would wait for given the effects of feel on the deposition, absorption, and degradation of persistent primary pollutants including pesticides". St-Hilaire and colleagues intentional prostate cancer rates in counties in the United States and looked for links to provincial survive patterns.
They found a link, and suggest it may exist because sneezles and wheezles weather slows the degradation of pollutants. Prostate cancer will impact about one in six men, according to grounding information in the study. Reports suggest it's more reciprocal in the northern hemisphere.
A budding enquiry links dry, discouraging climate to higher rates of prostate cancer. While the findings don't corroborate a direct link, researchers mistrust that weather may affect polluting and, in turn, boost prostate cancer rates ilosone from india. "We found that colder weather, and critical rainfall, were strongly correlated with prostate cancer," researcher Sophie St-Hilaire, of Idaho State University, said in a news broadcast release.
So "Although we can't hold certainly why this correlation exists, the trends are uniform with what we would wait for given the effects of feel on the deposition, absorption, and degradation of persistent primary pollutants including pesticides". St-Hilaire and colleagues intentional prostate cancer rates in counties in the United States and looked for links to provincial survive patterns.
They found a link, and suggest it may exist because sneezles and wheezles weather slows the degradation of pollutants. Prostate cancer will impact about one in six men, according to grounding information in the study. Reports suggest it's more reciprocal in the northern hemisphere.
Thursday, 16 June 2011
Experts Urge Parents To Buy Kids Sunglasses Against Ultraviolet Radiation
Experts Urge Parents To Buy Kids Sunglasses Against Ultraviolet Radiation.
With May designated as UV awareness month, experts are job on parents to get even festive mark to the protection of their children's eyes this summer. Although discrimination sponsorship is a concern for people of all ages, Prevent Blindness America, the nation's oldest affection fitness and safety organization, warns that children are extraordinarily vulnerable to the harmful ultraviolet A and B (UVA and UVB) impairment that can accompany Phoebus exposure cheapest prilosec. For one, children as a rule spend more time in the sun, the group noted.
In addition, the form highlights the American Optometric Association's cautionary conclusion that the lenses of pubescent eyes are more transparent than that of adults, risking retinal leaking to a greater degree of short wavelength light. "We shortage to remember to keep safe our eyes from UV every day of the year," Hugh R Parry, president and CEO of Prevent Blindness America, said in a scoop release. "UV rays reflecting off the water, sand, pavement and even snow are extraordinarily dangerous. We can promote our children to strain the thorough fondness protection by leading by example".
UV exposure has been linked to the appearance of cataracts, macular degeneration and a afield array of eye health issues, the experts noted. Prevent Blindness America advises that each and every one who goes out in the Helios should wear sunglasses that hamper out 99 percent to 100 percent of both UVA and UVB emanation - noting that sunglasses without such bulwark can actually cause the pupils to dilate, thereby doing more iniquity than good. A wide-brimmed hat or outstrip also offers some measure of eye protection, the heap suggested.
With specific respect to children, Prevent Blindness America further encourages parents to guard that sunglasses provide their child's impudence properly and shields the sun's rays from all directions. The catalogue points out that wrap-around sunglasses might be optimal in the later regard, because they additionally shelter the crust immediately surrounding a child's eyes. Sunglasses, they note, should always be composed of impact-resistant polycarbonates, rather than glass, and should be scratch-free.
With May designated as UV awareness month, experts are job on parents to get even festive mark to the protection of their children's eyes this summer. Although discrimination sponsorship is a concern for people of all ages, Prevent Blindness America, the nation's oldest affection fitness and safety organization, warns that children are extraordinarily vulnerable to the harmful ultraviolet A and B (UVA and UVB) impairment that can accompany Phoebus exposure cheapest prilosec. For one, children as a rule spend more time in the sun, the group noted.
In addition, the form highlights the American Optometric Association's cautionary conclusion that the lenses of pubescent eyes are more transparent than that of adults, risking retinal leaking to a greater degree of short wavelength light. "We shortage to remember to keep safe our eyes from UV every day of the year," Hugh R Parry, president and CEO of Prevent Blindness America, said in a scoop release. "UV rays reflecting off the water, sand, pavement and even snow are extraordinarily dangerous. We can promote our children to strain the thorough fondness protection by leading by example".
UV exposure has been linked to the appearance of cataracts, macular degeneration and a afield array of eye health issues, the experts noted. Prevent Blindness America advises that each and every one who goes out in the Helios should wear sunglasses that hamper out 99 percent to 100 percent of both UVA and UVB emanation - noting that sunglasses without such bulwark can actually cause the pupils to dilate, thereby doing more iniquity than good. A wide-brimmed hat or outstrip also offers some measure of eye protection, the heap suggested.
With specific respect to children, Prevent Blindness America further encourages parents to guard that sunglasses provide their child's impudence properly and shields the sun's rays from all directions. The catalogue points out that wrap-around sunglasses might be optimal in the later regard, because they additionally shelter the crust immediately surrounding a child's eyes. Sunglasses, they note, should always be composed of impact-resistant polycarbonates, rather than glass, and should be scratch-free.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)