The United States Ranks Last Compared With The Six Other Industrialized Countries.
Compared with six other industrialized nations, the United States ranks terminating when it comes to many measures of property constitution care, a unfamiliar blast concludes. Despite having the costliest haleness circumspection structure in the world, the United States is last or next-to-last in quality, efficiency, access to care, fair-mindedness and the power of its citizens to lead long, healthy, bounteous lives, according to a new report from the Commonwealth Fund, a Washington, DC-based clandestine principle focused on improving health care Possible buying neurocetam. "On many measures of condition system performance, the US has a crave way to go to perform as well as other countries that devote far less than we do on healthcare, yet cover everyone," the Commonwealth Fund's president, Karen Davis, said during a Tuesday matinal teleconference.
And "It is disappointing, but not surprising, that in defiance of our significant investment in well-being care, the US continues to linger behind other countries," she added. However, Davis believes unfledged health vigilance reform legislation - when fully enacted in 2014 - will go a elongate way to improving the trendy system. "Our hope and presumption is that when the law is fully enacted, we will match and even transcend the performance of other countries," she said.
The report compares the engagement of the American health care routine with those of Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. According to 2007 material included in the report, the US spends the most on salubrity care, at $7,290 per capita per year. That's almost twice the bulk emptied in Canada and nearly three times the speed of New Zealand, which spends the least.
The Netherlands, which has the highest-ranked trim custody system on the Commonwealth Fund list, spends only $3,837 per capita. Despite higher spending, the US ranks end or next to definitive in all categories, Davis said, and scored "particularly under the weather on measures of access, efficiency, disinterest and long, nutritious and valuable lives".
The US ranks in the mid-point of the pack in measures of effective and patient-centered care, she added. Overall, the Netherlands came in premier on the list, followed by the United Kingdom and Australia. Canada and the United States ranked sixth and seventh, Davis noted.
Speaking at the teleconference, Cathy Schoen, elder evil president at the Commonwealth Fund, mucronulate out that in 2008, 14 percent of US patients with hardened conditions had been given the impose upon medication or the unacceptable dose. That's twice the blunder grade observed in Germany and the Netherlands, she noted.
So "Adults in the United States also reported delays in being notified about kinky study results or given the wrong results at to some degree high rates," Schoen said. "Indeed, the rates were three times higher than in Germany and the Netherlands". "As a conclusion we grade wear in safety and do poorly on several dimensions of quality," Schoen said.
In addition, many Americans are still common without medical pains because of cost, she said. "We also do surprisingly ailing on access to primary worry and access to after hours care given our overall resources and spending," Schoen said. In fact, 54 percent of clan with long-standing conditions reported wealthy without needed care in 2008, compared with 13 percent in Great Britain and 7 percent in the Netherlands, she said.
The United States also ranked remain in efficiency, Schoen said. There are too many photocopy tests, too much paperwork, aged administrative costs and too many patients using difficulty rooms as doctor's offices. In addition, lack appears to be a big moneylender in whether Americans have access to care, the story found.
The United States also performed worst in terms of the army of ladies and gentlemen who perish early, in levels of infant mortality, and for vigorous life expectancy among older adults, Schoen said.
Dr David Katz, head of the Prevention Research Center at Yale University School of Medicine, commented that "as a doctor and worldwide healthiness practitioner, I have routinely oral out in favor of health care emendation in the US The responses evoked have not always been kind. Prominent middle the counterarguments has been: 'You should lead what health care is like in other countries'".
So "This publish utterly belies the idea that the former status quo for health misery delivery in the US was as good as it gets. Others have been doing better and we can, and should, too," he said. However, at least one wonderful doesn't find credible that fitness care reform, as it now stands, will solve these problems.
Dr Steffie Woolhandler, a professor of panacea at Harvard Medical School and co-founder of Physicians for a National Health Program, said that "the US has the worst form keeping set amidst the seven countries studied, and arguably the worst in the developed world sitemap. Unfortunately, the US will almost certainly maintain in ultimate place, since the recently passed salubriousness reform will leave 23 million Americans without coverage while enlarging the impersonation of the undisclosed insurance industry, which obstructs care and drives up costs," she said.
No comments:
Post a Comment